Wrong number
A model supplies a plausible figure without retrieving or calculating it from evidence. The answer looks precise but cannot be reproduced.
Altys separates language from calculation. Financial figures come from sourced data, material claims carry citations, historical answers respect what was knowable at the time, and core outputs can be exported so an analyst can reproduce the work outside the software.
A financial hallucination is not only a completely invented figure. It can be a real value with the wrong label, a valid disclosure used after it became stale, or a citation that sits beside a claim it does not support.
A model supplies a plausible figure without retrieving or calculating it from evidence. The answer looks precise but cannot be reproduced.
A quarterly number answers an annual question, or a year-to-date figure is compared with a full year. Both inputs may be real and the comparison still invalid.
Standalone and consolidated accounts, parent and subsidiary, or segment and group values are quietly mixed into one conclusion.
Today's corrected history is presented as if it had been available on a past decision date, introducing hindsight into research or a backtest.
A real filing can be attached to the wrong sentence. Reliable financial AI must prove that the cited evidence supports the exact company, period, reporting basis, unit and claim.
The system assigns each job to the layer that can perform it reliably. A language model helps read and explain. It is not the source database, calculation engine or final investment decision.
Company filings, XBRL statements, concalls, guidance and other research evidence enter with source and identity metadata.
Company, period, consolidated or standalone basis, unit, availability date and later vintages remain explicit rather than being inferred afresh from prose.
Ratios, factors, growth and forecast outputs use explicit methods over sourced inputs. Missing data remains missing and does not silently become zero.
AI searches the appropriate company evidence and structured data instead of relying on a model's general memory of the company.
The source sits beside the claim so an analyst can inspect the actual evidence, not only a bibliography after the answer.
An unsupported answer resolves to error or unavailable. Fluency cannot promote an unverified claim into a completed research result.
Consider a user asking for annual revenue growth when the source shows ₹100 crore in the prior year and ₹118 crore in the current year.
The value may sound reasonable, but the inputs, period, basis and rounding method are invisible. Asking again may produce a different result.
Both source values, their annual periods and reporting basis are attached. The result is reproducible, and the AI can explain it without originating it.
A result is easier to trust when it survives outside the product that produced it. Altys exports the working layers behind core research outputs, not only a polished final answer.
A current database can contain restatements, reclassifications and corrections published long after the original result. Altys preserves each vintage and the date it became usable, so a historical answer does not quietly borrow from the future.
Altys can make facts traceable, calculations reproducible and evidence faster to review. It cannot decide which assumption deserves belief, which risk matters most, when to act or how much capital to allocate.
For a practical evaluation, read seven tests before trusting AI stock analysis or use the 60-second verification checklist.
Altys is built to prevent hallucinated financial numbers. Figures come from sourced financial data and deterministic calculations, material research claims carry citations, and unsupported answers fail closed as unavailable instead of being completed with a plausible guess. No responsible system should replace analyst verification or claim that every possible error disappears.
No. Ratios, factors and forecast outputs run through explicit code-owned methods using identified inputs. AI can retrieve, compare and explain the result, but it is not the calculation engine that originates the number.
Yes. Strategy screens and scorecards export as formula-native Excel workbooks with inputs, eligibility, weights, calculations and provenance. GenGrid and analytical tables export as Excel-ready CSV. Alert rules are audited through versioned definitions, fired-by context and historical replay.
The answer resolves to error or unavailable. Altys does not allow an unsupported material claim to pass as a completed research answer simply because a language model can write plausible prose.
Point-in-time data distinguishes the period a value describes from the date it became knowable. This prevents later restatements and corrections from leaking into historical research, screens or backtests.
We will run Altys on your real research questions, source every material claim, and show exactly where the AI stops and the evidence begins.